Notifications
Clear all
Search result for: WA 0852 2611 9277 Jasa Design Interior Ruangan Untuk Dapur Apartment BTC Residence Bekasi
Page 1 / 3
Next
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| Answer to: How do you design a PCB for high-frequency circuits? | 11 Relevance | 8 months ago | LogicLab | Theoretical questions | |
| You're absolutely right—when moving into high-frequency PCB Design (in the MHz to GHz range), layout becomes critical for ensuring signal integrity and performance. At these frequencies, traces behave like transmission lines, so maintaining controlled impedance is essential. For most RF applications, a 50-ohm microstrip or stripline trace is standard, and you’ll need to calculate trace width based on your PCB stack-up, dielectric material, and copper thickness. Trace layout should avoid right-angle bends, use 45° angles or curves, and keep high-speed traces as short and direct as possible. Differential signals (like USB or LVDS) require matched trace lengths and consistent spacing to maintain impedance and minimize skew. The PCB stack-up plays a huge role in high-frequency performance. It's best to place signal layers adjacent to solid ground planes to provide a continuous return path and minimize loop area, which helps reduce EMI. A 4-layer or higher board with dedicated power and ground planes is generally recommended. When choosing a stack-up, consult your PCB fabricator to ensure the dielectric thicknesses and materials support your impedance requirements. Common mistakes in high-speed PCB Design include failing to provide a solid ground reference under signal traces, using excessive or poorly placed vias that introduce unwanted inductance, and improperly terminating high-speed lines, which can result in reflections and ringing. Power integrity is also crucial—decoupling capacitors should be placed close to power pins, and using a mix of values helps cover a wider frequency range. Lastly, improper grounding between analog and digital sections can lead to noise coupling, so careful partitioning or single-point grounding is advised. With proper attention to these details and the use of simulation tools, Designing high-frequency PCBs becomes much more manageable and repeatable. | |||||
| How do you design a PCB for high-frequency circuits? | 7 Relevance | 8 months ago | Nitin arora | Theoretical questions | |
| I’ve mostly worked with low-frequency analog and digital circuits so far, but now I’m starting to explore high-frequency Designs (in the MHz to GHz range), and I’m realizing that PCB layout becomes much more critical at these frequencies. I’m looking for practical tips or best practices when Designing printed circuit boards (PCBs) for high-frequency circuits. 1. What factors should I consider for trace layout and impedance control? 2. How important is the PCB stack-up, and how do I decide on it? 3. What are the common mistakes to avoid in high-speed or RF PCB Designs? | |||||
| Answer to: How is the job market for Electrical and Electronics Engineering graduates in the future? | 6 Relevance | 5 months ago | Sebastian | Theoretical questions | |
| Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEE) continues to offer solid career opportunities, though the nature of jobs is shifting with technology trends. Traditional industries like power generation, electrical utilities, and manufacturing still employ many EEE graduates, but the biggest growth areas are now in renewable energy, electric vehicles, IoT, automation, and semiconductors. For example, governments and companies are investing heavily in semiconductor Design and electronics manufacturing, which is creating strong demand for engineers with VLSI, embedded systems, and hardware Design skills. Similarly, the EV sector is growing quickly, opening up roles in motor control, battery management, and power electronics. Renewable energy and smart grid projects also need skilled engineers for integration, control systems, and energy storage solutions. Arduino, IoT, and automation skills are increasingly valued, as industries move toward Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing. Compared to IT/software jobs, core engineering salaries can sometimes start lower, but with specialization in areas like VLSI, embedded Design, or power systems, EEE graduates often find higher-paying roles and more stable long-term opportunities. | |||||
| Answer to: Most used flip-flop in the industry? | 6 Relevance | 7 months ago | electronic_God | Theoretical questions | |
| ... on the clock edge, which makes them really easy to understand and implement, especially when you're dealing with things like counters, registers, or finite state machines. On the other hand, flip-flops like JK and SR might seem more functional, but they come with added complications. For example, SR flip-flops can go into an invalid state if both inputs are high, and JK flip-flops—though they solve that issue—toggle in a WAy that can be tricky to manage in complex synchronous circuits. T flip-flops are mostly used in counters, but even they are usually ma ... | |||||
| How is the job market for Electrical and Electronics Engineering graduates in the future? | 2 Relevance | 6 months ago | Anil_Tech | Theoretical questions | |
| I’m planning to join college for my undergraduate studies in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and WAnted to get some insights into the job market. How are the career opportunities in this field currently, and what does the future look like for EEE graduates? Are there specific industries or emerging areas (like renewable energy, IoT, automation, or semiconductor Design) where demand is expected to grow? | |||||
| Most used flip-flop in the industry? | 2 Relevance | 7 months ago | Alfred Alonso | Theoretical questions | |
| Among all types (D, T, JK, SR), which flip-flop is preferred in practical digital circuit Design? I've read that D flip-flops are most common—why not use JK flip-flops since they offer more functionality? | |||||
| Moore vs Mealy State Machines – Which One Should I Use? | 2 Relevance | 7 months ago | DIY Electronica | Theoretical questions | |
| I’ve been learning about finite state machines and came across Moore and Mealy models. I understand that they both use states and transitions, but I’m a bit confused about how their outputs are handled and when to choose one over the other. Can someone explain the key differences in a practical context, and maybe give some guidance on when it’s better to use Moore vs Mealy in a digital Design? | |||||
| Answer to: Practical uses of Network Theorems | 6 Relevance | 8 months ago | Nitin arora | Theoretical questions | |
| The network theorems you study in textbooks are more than just academic exercises — they’re essential tools that engineers use in real-world circuit Design and troubleshooting. For example, when Designing power supplies or signal conditioning circuits, we often replace a complex part of the system with its Thevenin equivalent to predict how different loads will behave — without redoing the entire analysis. In power systems, Thevenin models are used to study fault conditions and Design protection schemes. These theorems also help in impedance matching in audio or RF circuits to ensure maximum power transfer. Even in PCB Design, they allow you to estimate voltage drops or current flow when the load changes. So while they may seem theoretical, they are frequently used behind the scenes to simplify, simulate, and optimize real-world circuits. | |||||
| Answer to: Moore vs Mealy State Machines – Which One Should I Use? | 4 Relevance | 7 months ago | Yvette | Theoretical questions | |
| ... behaviors: Moore outputs change only on state transitions (i.e., clock edges), while Mealy outputs can respond immediately to input changes without WAiting for a state transition. In practice, this means that Moore machines are more stable and less prone to glitches, making them easier to simulate and debug. However, they may require more states and often have a one-clock-cycle delay in response. On the other hand, Mealy machines can be more efficient, often requiring fewer states and providing faster responses, but they can suffer from glitches if the inp ... | |||||
| Answer to: Good circuit simulation softwares- Any suggestions? | 4 Relevance | 8 months ago | Neil_Overtorn | Softwares | |
| I can share my personal favorite, which is Proteus. It’s great because it supports both analog and digital circuits and has built-in support for Arduino simulation. I’ve used it quite a bit for embedded system projects, and being able to upload real Arduino code (hex files or even source) and see how the microcontroller interacts with the rest of the circuit is incredibly helpful. The interface is fairly user-friendly once you get the hang of it, and the component library is extensive. What I also like is that it includes PCB layout capabilities, so you can go from simulation to PCB Design in the same environment. It’s a paid tool, but they offer student versions or lower-cost licenses that are perfect if you’re not working on commercial-scale projects. If you're looking for something free, Tinkercad Circuits is another solid option for beginners. It supports Arduino quite well and is completely browser-based, though it's not as advanced for analog simulation or PCB Design. | |||||
| RE: Why Place Decoupling Caps Near ICs? | 2 Relevance | 4 months ago | xecor | Theoretical questions | |
| @electronic_god The 0.1 µF decoupling capacitor placed near an IC’s power pin serves to provide immediate energy and absorb high-frequency noise when the chip’s current demand suddenly changes. When an IC switches states, it draws a short burst of current. If that current must travel from a distant power source through long PCB traces, the inductance and resistance of those traces cause a brief voltage drop, leading to supply fluctuations or even logic errors. A small capacitor located right beside the power pin can release charge within nanoseconds, keeping the voltage stable. If the capacitor is placed farther away, the trace inductance increases significantly, and the capacitor becomes ineffective at high frequencies. In practical Design, a 0.1 µF capacitor is typically used to handle high-frequency transients and switching noise, while larger capacitors such as 1 µF or 10 µF address lower-frequency voltage variations and stabilize the overall supply. Usually, each IC power pin has its own 0.1 µF ceramic capacitor to shunt high-frequency disturbances; an additional 1 µF or 4.7 µF ceramic capacitor is placed nearby to handle mid-frequency energy needs; and a larger 10 µF to 100 µF tantalum or electrolytic capacitor is located at the power input or voltage regulator output to serve as bulk energy storage for low-frequency stability. The decoupling capacitor should be placed as close as possible to both the power and ground pins of the IC, with traces kept short and wide, preferably connected directly to the power and ground planes to minimize loop area and parasitic inductance. Ceramic capacitors, especially those with X7R or X5R dielectric, are ideal for this purpose because they offer low equivalent series inductance (ESL) and low equivalent series resistance (ESR), allowing fast current response. In summary, the location of the 0.1 µF capacitor determines whether it can respond effectively to transient events, while the combination of different capacitor values defines the frequency range the decoupling network can handle. Small capacitors react quickly to high-frequency noise, and larger ones maintain steady voltage over longer timescales. Together, they ensure the IC’s power supply remains clean, stable, and reliable. Attachment : 4.png | |||||
| Answer to: Why is impedance matching important in RF circuits? | 2 Relevance | 10 months ago | TechTalks | Theoretical questions | |
| Impedance matching in RF circuits prevents signal reflections, maximizes power transfer, and maintains efficiency. A mismatch causes standing WAves, signal distortion, and reduced transmission quality. It also leads to power loss, excessive heat dissipation, and potential damage to components like RF amplifiers. Poor matching can narrow bandwidth and introduce noise, affecting overall performance. Engineers use matching networks, quarter-wave transformers, and proper PCB Design to ensure efficient power transfer and signal integrity. | |||||
| Answer to: What’s the practical limit on daisy-chaining shift registers? | 2 Relevance | 6 months ago | Rahav | Theoretical questions | |
| Daisy-chaining a large number of shift registers, such as the popular 74HC595, is technically possible, but there are practical limitations you need to consider. Each shift register introduces a propagation delay, and as the chain gets longer, these delays accumulate. When chaining around 100 shift registers, the total propagation delay can become significant, requiring you to slow down the clock frequency considerably to ensure reliable data transfer. High-speed operation becomes nearly impossible at this scale without special measures. Signal integrity is another major concern. Longer chains increase the length of the data and clock lines, which can result in voltage drops, reflections, and noise issues. To maintain clean signals, you will likely need to use buffers or repeaters at certain points in the chain, along with careful PCB layout and proper decoupling. If your Design truly requires controlling such a large number of outputs, consider whether a different approach might be more suitable. For example, I²C or SPI GPIO expanders with unique addressing can drastically reduce complexity. Alternatively, you could use multiple smaller chains driven by separate microcontroller pins. | |||||
| Answer to: Difference between asynchronous and synchronous resets in flip-flops? | 2 Relevance | 7 months ago | Kanishk | Theoretical questions | |
| Asynchronous and synchronous resets both serve to bring flip-flops to a known initial state, but they differ significantly in how and when they operate. An asynchronous reset takes effect immediately, regardless of the clock. This means that the moment the reset signal is asserted, the flip-flop resets—whether or not the clock is running. On the other hand, a synchronous reset only takes effect on the active edge of the clock (usually the rising edge). So even if the reset signal is asserted, the flip-flop will not reset until the next clock edge occurs. In digital Design or when writing HDL like Verilog or VHDL, it is generally recommended to default to synchronous resets. They are easier to work with in timing analysis, more predictable in simulation, and better supported by most FPGA tools. Synchronous resets ensure that all logic changes happen in sync with the clock, which reduces the risk of glitches and metastability. However, there are situations where an asynchronous reset is necessary, such as when dealing with logic that receives a clock from an external device (a source-synchronous system) where the clock can stop. In such cases, a synchronous reset would not work because the flip-flop wouldn’t reset without a clock edge, so an asynchronous reset becomes essential to ensure proper initialization or fault handling. That said, asynchronous resets come with critical caveats, particularly around how they are removed. If the reset signal is deasserted (goes low or inactive) while the clock is not running, the circuit may enter an unpredictable state. To prevent this, Designers often use a technique called synchronous reset removal, where the asynchronous reset is passed through a synchronizer (usually a two-stage flip-flop chain) so that the system only comes out of reset on a clean, clocked edge. This ensures stable behavior and avoids metastability issues. It’s also important to avoid relying on the reset value of an asynchronously reset flip-flop immediately after reset; doing so can lead to inconsistent behavior across builds, as synthesis tools may handle this differently. | |||||
Page 1 / 3
Next
