Notifications
Clear all
Search result for: WA 0812 2782 5310 RAB Renovasi Plafon Board Terpercaya Jebres Surakarta
Page 6 / 6
Prev
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| Answer to: Question About Using Arduino Pro Mini Library in Proteus V30 | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Arduino | |
| Just like any other circuit simulation, it lets you simulate your projects directly in Proteus, so you can test your circuits and code virtually before working with actual components. You can upload your Arduino sketches into the simulation, and it behaves just like the real Board, making debugging and troubleshooting super convenient. And of course, you can interface modules and sensors. This makes it perfect for simulating real-world projects without the fear of damaging components. If you're just starting out, I recommend beginning with simple projects like blinking an LED or reading a sensor value to get comfortable. Make use of Proteus's built-in tools, like virtual oscilloscopes and logic analyzers, to visualize your outputs and debug your circuits. Also, keep your component libraries updated to access the latest modules. | |||||
| Answer to: What is the difference between Arduino Nano Every and Nano RP2040? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Arduino | |
| Well, these two are very different Boards if you look at the specs. I do not understand why you are confused between these two Boards. Arduino Nano Every: This Board does not include built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth capabilities. It's suitable for projects that don't require wireless communication or where such features can be added externally if needed. Priced at approximately €15.30 (around ₹1,350), it's a cost-effective choice for basic projects. Arduino R02040 Connect: Equipped with the u-blox NINA-W102 module, it offers both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity. This makes it ideal for Internet of Things (IoT) projects or applications requiring wireless communication. Available for about €30.70 (around ₹2,700), reflecting its enhanced features and connectivity options. Which One Should You Choose? Nano Every: If you’re on a budget, don’t need wireless connectivity, or are working on simple projects, this is an excellent choice. Nano RP2040 Connect: If your project needs built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, or if you’re exploring more advanced or resource-intensive applications, this is the better option. | |||||
| Answer to: What connector do I need? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Circuits and Projects | |
| ... and latch design are typical of JST PH connectors. To replace:Female Side (Cable): Search for “JST PH 2.0mm 2-Pin Female Connector with Wires” (pre-assembled).Male Side (PCB): Look for “JST PH 2.0mm 2-Pin Male Header” to solder onto the PCB. Alright, that mess on the Board? Totally fixable. You can try this: Grab some isopropyl alcohol (the stronger, the better – like 90%+). Find a soft toothbrush (or anything soft-bristled). No need to get aggressive here; gentle scrubbing works best. Dip the brush in alcohol and start scrubbing off the gunk. For real ... | |||||
| Answer to: STM32 vs Arduino: Which One is Better? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Sebastian | Hardware/Schematic | |
| ... whole mindset. You’ll need to read datasheets, configure clock settings, and deal with low-level programming. The power is there, but it comes at the cost of simplicity. My advice: If you’re comfortable diving deep into hardware-level programming and WAnt to push your projects further, give STM32 a shot. Otherwise, maybe try a more powerful Arduino Board first, like the Arduino Due. | |||||
| Answer to: Arduino UNO R4 Wi-Fi Project ideas! | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Yvette | Arduino | |
| Here is the list of UNO R4 WiFi projects I found during my research: 1. Weather Station Using Arduino UNO R4 WiFi & VisuinoBuild a weather station to monitor temperature, humidity, and pressure using sensors. The data is displayed and updated in real time using Visuino software.Project Link: Weather Station Project 2. Arduino UNO R4 WiFi ExperimentsExplore multiple small projects to familiarize yourself with the UNO R4 WiFi, including controlling the onboard LED matrix and creating simple WiFi apps.Project Link: UNO R4 WiFi Experiments 3. Home Automation with Web ServerSet up a home automation system using a local web server hosted on the Arduino UNO R4 WiFi. Control home appliances remotely without relying on third-party IoT platforms.Project Link: Home Automation System 4. LED Matrix AnimationsLearn how to program the built-in 12x8 LED matrix on the UNO R4 WiFi to display custom animations and graphics. A great project for beginners to practice coding and LED control.Project Link: LED Matrix Programming 5. Smartphone-like Device with AppsTransform the Arduino UNO R4 WiFi into a smartphone-like device with multiple apps, a keyboard, and cloud sync. An innovative project showcasing the Board's capabilities.Project Link: Smartphone-like Device Project 6. SparkFun Qwiic Kit IntegrationConnect various sensors and components using the SparkFun Qwiic Kit with the Arduino UNO R4 WiFi. This guide is ideal for experimenting with multiple peripherals.Project Link: SparkFun Qwiic Kit Guide P.S.: I tried some of these not all. | |||||
| Answer to: What’s the difference between a Microprocessor and a Microcontroller? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Theoretical questions | |
| ... Unit) and needs external components like memory (RAM/ROM), input/output interfaces, and peripherals to work. Think of it as what you’d find in a computer, like an Intel Core i7 or an AMD Ryzen. It’s designed for complex tasks and multitasking. Applications: Computers, laptops, and smartphones. Flexibility: You get to design the system around it by adding the components you need. Microcontroller (MCU): A microcontroller, on the other hand, is more like an all-in-one package. It includes a CPU(a processor), memory (RAM/ROM), and peripherals like GPIO pins ... | |||||
| Answer to: Crystal oscillators vs ceramic resonators? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Arduino | |
| Absolutely, let’s break down the differences between crystal oscillators and ceramic resonators first. 1. Crystal Oscillator: Crystal oscillators are made from quartz and vibrate mechanically when an AC signal is applied, producing a precise and stable frequency. They are highly accurate and maintain their frequency well, even with changes in temperature or stray capacitance. This makes them ideal for applications requiring strict timing, such as communication protocols or clocks. 2. Ceramic Resonator: Ceramic resonators, while also vibrating mechanically when an AC signal is applied, are made from ceramic materials and are less accurate than quartz crystals. They can have slight variations in frequency due to temperature changes and aging, which isn’t ideal for timing-critical applications but is acceptable for many general-purpose uses. They are more cost-effective and compact, making them suitable for designs where high precision isn’t as critical. Why the Difference in Arduino Boards? The Arduino Uno uses a crystal oscillator made of quartz, for being highly precise and stable. It keeps the clock signal accurate with minimal drift over time and temperature changes but costs more. On the other hand, the Arduino Nano uses a ceramic resonator, less accurate compared to the crystal oscillator as already mentioned, but it comes with advantages: it’s smaller and more affordable. The resonator still provides a 16 MHz clock, but you might notice slight frequency variations due to temperature changes or aging. For most hobby projects where perfect timing isn’t crucial, the Nano’s resonator works just fine and helps keep the cost and size of the Board down. | |||||
| Answer to: Why should one buy original Arduino boards and not clones? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Jignesh | Arduino | |
| Honestly, it comes down to a few key factors. I’ve used both original Arduinos and clones, and here’s what I’ve noticed: 1. Quality of Components:Original Boards are made with high-quality components and go through strict testing. That means they're reliable and tend to last longer. With clones, the manufacturers often cut costs by using cheaper components, which sometimes leads to issues like bad voltage regulation or even random failures. It’s a bit of a gamble—you might get a good clone, or you might end up with something less reliable. 2. Support and Community:By buying an original Board, you’re supporting the Arduino team and their continued development of the platform. Plus, you can rely on their official support if something goes wrong. With clones, you’re on your own, and while the community can help, it’s not the same as having official support. 3. Price:The big reason people go for clones is price—they’re much cheaper, and for simple or throwaway projects, they can be a good choice. But for anything critical where reliability matters, I'd stick with the original. A few bucks saved upfront isn’t worth the headache of dealing with potential issues down the line. Clones are legal as long as they don’t use the Arduino logo or branding, but some knock-offs illegally slap the Arduino logo on them, which can be misleading. Supporting the original also helps the team keep developing new Boards and features. | |||||
| Answer to: New Pi Pico 2 by Raspberry Pi—What are your opinions? | 1 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | RPi Pico | |
| ... us a total of 12 state machines. 4 more than the original Security features Price- just $5 1 more ADC(total 4) and 8 more PWM(total 24) then the original Pico. Supports C/C++, Arduino IDE, Circuitpython and Micropython Now Disadvantages: Still no USB-C No reset button It would have been better if there WAs a built-in WiFi chip(link Pico W) if they WAnt to compete with ESP32. But of course, they will sell it separately as a new Board and call it Pico 2W. Please add to this if you think there are more. Also, will publish an in-depth article on Pico 2 ... | |||||
| Confused About NODEMCU and ESP8266 – Are They the Same? | 1 Relevance | 2 years ago | Bryan | ESP32 | |
| Hi everyone, I'm trying to understand the relationship between NodeMCU and ESP8266. I've come across both terms in my research, but I'm a bit confused about how they relate to each other. Is ESP8266 referred to as NodeMCU, or are they distinct from one another? From what I gather, ESP8266 is a Wi-Fi module that's widely used in IoT projects due to its low cost and robust capabilities. However, I also see references to NodeMCU, which seems to be associated with ESP8266, but I'm not clear on whether NodeMCU is just another name for ESP8266 or if it represents something different, like a development Board or a specific firmware. For context, I'm new to electronics and robotics, and I'm trying to get a solid understanding of the components I'm working with before diving into more complex projects. If NodeMCU and ESP8266 are indeed different, I'd appreciate an explanation of what each one is and how they interact. thank you | |||||
| Pi Pico VS UNO: Which one is best for beginners? | 1 Relevance | 2 years ago | catElectronics | Arduino | |
| Hello fellow tech enthusiasts, I am totally new to this field of microcontrollers. I saw my friend doing some cool projects using an Arduino Board called UNO. This got me interested in buying myself one. After some research, I have narrowed it down to two popular options: the Raspberry Pi Pico and the Arduino Uno. Both seem great, but I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for a beginner like me. On one hand, UNO has a very active community and is easy to start with. On the other hand, Pico supports both Python and Arduino programming and is more powerful. I'm particularly interested in hearing from those who have used both platforms. Which one would you recommend for someone just starting out? Any specific pros and cons that might help me make a decision? Thank you very much. | |||||
| Answer to: Why so many different versions of Nano? | 1 Relevance | 2 years ago | Admin | Arduino | |
| Nano is a very popular dev Board and keeping the "Nano" name might be a strategic decision for brand recognition. Even though some Nanos differ significantly(like having WIFI functionality), they are similar because of: Small form factor: All Nanos are compact and breadboard-friendly, making them ideal for projects with limited space. Basic functionality: They all retain the core functionality of the original Nano, making them easy to learn and use for beginners familiar with the platform. While features differ, the "Nano" name emphasizes this core concept, making them recognizable as part of the Nano family. | |||||
Page 6 / 6
Prev
