Notifications
Clear all
Search result for: WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Renovasi Rumah Type 50 3 Kamar Tidur Sukoharjo
Page 1 / 3
Next
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| Answer to: New Pi Pico 2 by Raspberry Pi—What are your opinions? | 8 Relevance | 2 years ago | Admin | RPi Pico | |
| ... us a Total of 12 state machines. 4 more than the original Security features Price- just $5 1 more ADC(total 4) and 8 more PWM(total 24) then the original Pico. Supports C/C++, Arduino IDE, Circuitpython and Micropython Now Disadvantages: Still no USB-C No reset button It would have been better if there WAs a built-in WiFi chip(link Pico W) if they WAnt to compete with ESP32. But of course, they will sell it separately as a new board and call it Pico 2W. Please add to this if you think there are more. Also, will publish an in-depth article on Pico 2 ... | |||||
| RE: Why are resistors in parallel preferred over a single resistor in some circuits? | 5 Relevance | 1 year ago | Chiris | Circuits and Projects | |
| @bryan Using multiple resistors in parallel instead of a single resistor can offer several advantages, depending on the specific requirements of the circuit. Here are some key benefits and scenarios where this technique is commonly applied: 1. Power Dissipation: Advantage: When resistors are connected in parallel, the overall power dissipation is shared between the individual resistors. This can prevent overheating or excessive power dissipation in a single resistor, especially in high-power applications. Example: In power supplies or motor driver circuits, where large amounts of current flow through resistors, parallel resistors help distribute the heat more evenly, preventing one resistor from getting too hot and potentially burning out. 2. Improved Thermal Management: Advantage: Distributing the current across multiple resistors can help manage heat more effectively. A single high-power resistor may have limitations on how much power it can dissipate before it reaches unsafe temperatures. By using parallel resistors, the heat is spread out, improving overall thermal performance. Example: In high-power resistor networks used in voltage dividers or current sensing, parallel resistors allow better thermal management without the need for specialized heat sinks. 3. Availability of Components: Advantage: It may be more practical or cost-effective to use multiple standard-value resistors than to source a single resistor with the required value, especially in cases where a precise resistance value is not readily available in a high-power rating. Example: Sometimes a designer may need a resistor with a specific value that is not commonly available, but by combining resistors of different standard values in parallel, the desired resistance can be approximated. This can be more convenient than ordering a custom resistor. 4. Increased Power Rating: Advantage: Multiple resistors in parallel increase the Total power handling capability of the resistor network. The power rating of the parallel combination is effectively the sum of the individual power ratings of each resistor. Example: For example, two resistors each rated for 1W in parallel can handle up to 2W of power in Total, which would not be possible with a single 1W resistor. 5. Tolerance and Precision: Advantage: In some cases, using multiple resistors can help achieve a more precise overall resistance value, especially if high tolerance resistors are used in parallel. The parallel combination may help average out the tolerance errors of individual resistors, leading to a more predictable and consistent resistance. Example: In precision circuits, such as voltage dividers in analog signal processing, multiple resistors with tight tolerances might be combined to achieve the desired resistance value with reduced error margins. 6. Redundancy and Reliability: Advantage: Using parallel resistors can improve the reliability of the circuit. If one resistor fails (e.g., due to overheating), the remaining resistors in the parallel configuration can continue to carry the current, which can help prevent a complete circuit failure. Example: This is especially useful in mission-critical applications where reliability is key, such as in automotive or aerospace circuits. Common Applications: Power Dissipation: Power supplies, motor drivers, and high-current load resistors. Thermal Management: Voltage dividers and high-power applications. Precision Circuits: Applications where multiple standard resistors are used to approximate a desired resistance with minimal tolerance error. Redundancy: Safety-critical applications where resistor failure could compromise circuit performance. Conclusion: Using resistors in parallel is a useful technique, especially when dealing with high power, thermal management, or component availability. It allows for better distribution of power, increased reliability, and often better thermal performance. While it might seem simpler to just use a single resistor, the flexibility, safety, and performance benefits make this approach preferable in certain scenarios. | |||||
| What’s the practical limit on daisy-chaining shift registers? | 3 Relevance | 8 months ago | Nitin arora | Theoretical questions | |
| I know that shift registers like the 74HC595 can be daisy-chained to expand outputs, but I’m wondering where the practical limit lies. Is the limit mainly due to propagation delay and timing issues, or do factors like power consumption, loading on the data and clock lines, and signal integrity also become major concerns as the chain gets longer? Are there any general guidelines (such as maximum number of devices or Total outputs) before performance or reliability starts to drop? I’d be interested to hear from anyone who has pushed the number of chained shift registers in a real project. | |||||
| RE: Pi Pico VS UNO: Which one is best for beginners? | 3 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Arduino | |
| @sophie Fair points! The Pico is definitely a solid option, especially if you’re into Python. That said, I still think the Arduino Uno is easier for Total beginners, just because there’s WAy more support, tutorials, and libraries. If you ever get stuck, chances are someone’s already solved it. Plus, working with C/C++ on Arduino isn’t as scary as it sounds—tons of example codes make it pretty straightforward. | |||||
| RE: What exactly is PWM resolution ? | 3 Relevance | 1 year ago | Sebastian | Hardware/Schematic | |
| Good point by @FullBridgeRectifier . Just to clarify for anyone new to this: when we say “divide by 255 instead of 256,” it’s because we’re looking at the maximum value the PWM can take, not the Total count of values. This WAy, your duty cycle calculations always correctly reach 100%. | |||||
| Difference between asynchronous and synchronous resets in flip-flops? | 5 Relevance | 9 months ago | J.Smith | Theoretical questions | |
| My teacher mentioned that there's an important distinction between asynchronous and synchronous resets used in flip-flops, but I’m still a bit confused about how they actually differ in behavior. From what I understand, both Types reset the flip-flop to a known state, but: How does the timing of an asynchronous reset differ from a synchronous one? When designing digital circuits or writing HDL (like Verilog or VHDL), how do I decide which Type to use? Are there any pros, cons, or common pitfalls I should be aware of with either reset Type? I'd appreciate a practical explanation or examples that clarify when and why one might be preferred over the other. | |||||
| RE: What exactly is PWM resolution ? | 3 Relevance | 1 year ago | FullBridgeRectifier | Hardware/Schematic | |
| @ankunegi The answer is on point but I think there's a mistake in your calculation. To calculate the duty cycle, we have to divide it by 255(the maximum value) and not 256(The Total no. of steps). For example: A 2-bit PWM signal has 4 possible steps: 0,1,2 and 3 corresponding to 0%, 33.33%, 66.67% and 100% duty cycle. You get this by dividing by 3, not 4. If you divide it by 4, you will get 25%. Which means 0%, 25%, 50% and 75%. See, you are not getting 100% duty cycle in this case. | |||||
| RE: Is It Safe to Control 15 LEDs Directly from Arduino Pins? | 3 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Hardware/Schematic | |
| 1. Yes you can. But then you have to turn ON only one LED at a time. 2. It is simple. If each LED consumes 12mA we get, Total current= 12X15 = 180mA, which is below the maximum rating. Now resistor value = 5V/12mA = 416 ohms. | |||||
| Answer to: Why Does analogWrite Use a 0-255 Range for PWM? | 3 Relevance | 2 years ago | Sebastian | Programming | |
| To the point answer by Techtalks. Just WAnt to add one important point here: The PWM pins on UNO have an 8-bit resolution. This gives us 256 discrete duty cycles, since 2^8 = 256. Example: 2 bit means 4 possible duty cycles. For PWM, they would be: 0, 33.33%, 66.66%, and 100%. Similarly, 4-bit means 16 duty cycles, and 8-bit means 256 cycles. Now why does the PWM range from 0 to 255 and not 256? Because when you count 0, the Total values from 0 to 255 are 256. | |||||
| Answer to: Difference between active and passive buzzer and how to identify them? | 5 Relevance | 1 year ago | Admin | Theoretical questions | |
| For a tank WAter level control system, both active and passive buzzers can be used for sound alerts, but which one is best depends on your needs. Key Differences:Active Buzzer: This Type comes with an internal oscillating circuit, meaning it generates sound as soon as you power it. You don't need any extra control or signal from a microcontroller—just apply voltage (like 5V), and it will produce a constant tone. This is ideal for simple "on/off" alerts. Pros: Easy to use, no extra coding needed to generate sound. Cons: Fixed tone—no control over pitch or ... | |||||
| Answer to: Why hasn't Arduino added a USB-C port to the UNO R3? | 5 Relevance | 2 years ago | Tech Geek | Hardware/Schematic | |
| ... Additionally, USB-C connectors and cables are generally more expensive than USB Type-B, especially in large quantities. This could increase the production costs of Arduino boards, potentially making them less affordable for hobbyists and students. When the Uno R3 WAs released, USB-C WAs either just emerging or not widely adopted, so using it wouldn't have been practical at the time. However, it's worth noting that the latest Arduino Uno R4 does include a USB-C port, showing that Arduino is gradually moving towards newer standards where it makes sense. | |||||
| Answer to: Differences Between LM358 Temperature Sensor and Thermistor? | 5 Relevance | 2 years ago | Jignesh | Theoretical questions | |
| Thermistors cost much less than the LM35 temperature sensor but require calibration due to their non-linear nature. At the same time, a thermistor is more accurate and precise(down to +/- 0.1°C) than an LM35(around +/- 0.5°C). LM35: Very easy to integrate with Arduino. You can read the output voltage directly using an analog pin, and with simple conversion (multiply by 100 to convert from mV to °C), you get the temperature. Thermistors: While they can be integrated, they often require additional components (like a resistor for a voltage divider) and more complex calculations to convert resistance to temperature. This can make them slightly more challenging to set up. Main Differences Feature LM35 Temperature Sensor Thermistor Type Integrated circuit (analog voltage output) Resistor (typically NTC or PTC) Output Outputs a linear voltage (10 mV/°C) Resistance changes non-linearly with temperature Temperature Range Typically -55 to +150 °C Varies, but generally -40 to +125 °C Accuracy Typically ±0.5 °C or better Can be very accurate, but depends on the Type and calibration Response Time Fast response time Generally fast but varies by design Ease of Use Simple to interface with Arduino (analog input) Requires more complex calculations for linearization Calibration Usually factory calibrated Often requires calibration and look-up tables for accuracy For most projects requiring precise temperature monitoring with reliable readings and ease of integration with Arduino, the LM35 is likely the best option. However, if you need the highest accuracy and can manage the additional complexity, consider using a thermistor P.S.: LM358 is an OP-AMP IC. LM35 is a temperature sensor. | |||||
Page 1 / 3
Next
